FYSIOTERAPEUTEN 5/24 27 elle tilpasninger. Fysioterapeutene har ulike betraktninger knyttet hvordan og når disse verktøyene bør anvendes. Slike nyanser bør diskuteres i fagmiljøet, både av fysioterapeuter og andre fagpersoner som vurderer barn og unges motoriske funksjon. Videre forskning og fagutvikling bør vurdere nye utforminger av kartleggingsverktøy som ivaretar barn og unges mestringsopplevelse, samtidig som de beholder reproduserbarheten og øvrige måleegenskaper. Litteraturliste 1.Hallemans A, Verbeque E, Van de Walle P. Chapter 14 - Motor functions. In: Gallagher A, Bulteau C, Cohen D, Michaud JL, editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 173: Elsevier; 2020. p. 157-70. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64150-2.00015-0 2.Lobo MA, Harbourne RT, Dusing SC, McCoy SW. Grounding early intervention: physical therapy cannot just be about motor skills anymore. Phys Ther. 2013;93(1):94-103. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120158 3. Evensen KAI, Sellæg S, Stræte AC, Hansen AE, Meisingset I. Profile of children referred to primary health care physiotherapy: a longitudinal observational study in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):16 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-02005988-8 4. Lipkin PH, Macias MM. Promoting Optimal Development: Identifying Infants and Young Children With Developmental Disorders Through Developmental Surveillance and Screening. Pediatrics. 2020;145(1). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-3449 5. Blank R, Smits-Engelsman B, Polatajko H, Wilson P. European Academy for Childhood Disability (EACD): recommendations on the definition, diagnosis and intervention of developmental coordination disorder (long version). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(1):54-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04171.x 6. Demont A, Gedda M, Lager C, de Lattre C, Gary Y, Keroulle E, et al. Evidence-Based, Implementable Motor Rehabilitation Guidelines for Individuals With Cerebral Palsy. Neurology. 2022;99(7):283-97. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200936 7. Fay D, Brock E, Peneton S, Simon R, Splan M, Sullivan L, Weiler A. Physical Therapists’ Use and Alteration of Standardized Assessments of Motor Function in Children. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2018;30(4):318-25. DOI: 10.1097/ PEP.0000000000000532 8. O’Connor B, Kerr C, Shields N, Imms C. Understanding allied health practitioners’ use of evidence-based assessments for children with cerebral palsy: a mixed methods study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2019;41(1):53-65. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1373376 9. Majnemer A. Benefits of Using Outcome Measures in Pediatric Rehabilitation. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics. 2010;30(3):165-7. DOI: 10.3109/01942638.2010.484353 10. Braun T, Rieckmann A, Weber F, Grüneberg C. Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey. BMC Health Services Research. 2018;18(1):810. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-0183563-2 11. Richter R, Maric F. Ecological Bodies and Relational Anatomies: Toward a Transversal Foundation for Planetary Health Education. Challenges. 2022;13(2):39. DOI: 10.3390/challe13020039 12. Nicholls DA, Gibson BE. The body and physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26(8):497-509. DOI: 10.3109/09593981003710316 13. Bjorbækmo WS, Engelsrud GH. Experiences of being tested: a critical discussion of the knowledge involved and produced in the practice of testing in children’s rehabilitation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2011;14(2):123-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-010-9254-3 14. Hanna SE, Russell DJ, Bartlett DJ, Kertoy M, Rosenbaum PL, Wynn K. Measurement practices in pediatric rehabilitation: a survey of physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists in Ontario. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2007;27(2):25-42. PMID: 17442653 15. Knox V, Vuoskoski P, Mandy A. Use of outcome measures in children with severe cerebral palsy: A survey of U.K. physiotherapists. Physiother Res Int. 2019;24(4):e1786. DOI: 10.1002/pri.1786 16. UiO. Nettskjema: Universitetet i Oslo; u.å [Available from: https://www.uio.no/ tjenester/it/adm-app/nettskjema/. 17. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687 18. Paris V, Devaux M, Wei L. Health Systems Institutional Characteristics. 2010. 19. Thornquist E. Fagutvikling i fysioterapi: Gyldendal; 1988. 20. World Physioterapy. Standards of physical therapy practice. 2011 [Available from: https://world.physio/guideline/standards. Abstract Title: To test or not to test? A study mapping clinical practice of assessing motor function among Norwegian physiotherapists Research question: How is the use of, and experience with standardized tools for assessing motor functions in children and adolescents among physiotherapists in Norway? Method: A mixed method study used a questionnaire with open and closed questions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and direct and summative content analysis. Results: Among 103 respondents, physiotherapists employed in specialized health care and physiotherapists without further education were the primary users of standardized tools. Standardized tools were more commonly used for younger children, with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Movement assessment battery for Children (M-ABC) being the most frequently employed. Physiotherapists emphasized the importance of considering the child`s well-being during testing and never relied solely on standardized assessments. Conclusion: Critical thinking regarding the use of standardized measurement tools should be emphasized. Further research and professional development should consider new designs of measurement tools that consider children`s sense of mastery, while also maintaining reproducibility and other measurement properties. Keywords: Motor function, standardized measures, clinical practice, children, and adolescents. Tenk Kommunikasjon | tenkkom.no Uten redaktør Med redaktør Faktabasert - Pålitelig - Ansvarlig Du mottar mange hundre budskap hver dag. Det er viktigere enn noen gang å kunne stole på at det du leser og ser i mediene er faktabasert og pålitelig. Redaktørens rolle er å være uavhengig, og å sikre en balansert dekning av ditt fagfelt. Den jobben gjør vi på vegne av deg. Leser du et av Fagpressens blader eller nettsteder – slik du gjør akkurat nå – kan du være trygg på at innholdet som er viktig for deg er vurdert og ivaretatt av en grundig redaksjon.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTQ3Mzgy