Fysioterapeuten 7-2022

FYSIOTERAPEUTEN 7/22 29 utvikling av samhandlingsmodeller kan bedre samarbeidet om å fremme arbeidsdeltakelse hos pasienter som er sykmeldt. Takk Takk til Nic Eland, Ida Kvinge, Randi Sviland og Bente Frisk for gode innspill til studien. Referanser 1. van der Noordt M, Jzelenberg H, Droomers M et al. Health effects of employment: a systematic review of prospective studies. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(10):730-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101891 2. Waddell GBA. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: University of Huddersfield; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/51.2.124 3. Statens arbeidsmiljøinstitutt 2018. Faktabok om arbeidsmiljø og helse. 4. Regjeringen. IA-avtalen 2019 [updated 25.04.2022. Available from: https:// www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/arbeidsliv/arbeidsmiljo-og-sikkerhet/inkluderende_arbeidsliv/ia-avtalen-20192022/hva-er-inkluderende-arbeidsliv/ id2631314/ 5. Helsedirektoratet, Arbeids-og velferdsdirektoratet. Tilstand og utfordringer på arbeid-helseområdet. 2019. 6. Helsedirektoratet, Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet. Nytt nasjonalt konsept HelseIArbeid. 2016. 7. Norsk Fysioterapeutforbund. Visjoner, verdier og hovedmål. [Updated 26.04.2022. Available from: https://fysio.no/Hva-mener-NFF/Visjon-verdier-oghovedmaal 8. Kantar. Helsepolitisk barometer 2019 [Updated 25.04.2022. Available from: https://www.kantar.no/globalassets/ekspertiseomrader/politikk-og-samfunn/helsepolitisk/2019/presentasjon-helsepolitisk-barometer-2019.pdf 9. Hunskår S, Fosse A, Hetlevik I, Hjortdahl P, Holtedahl K, Sandvik H. S. Allmenmedisin. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2013, s. 167. 10. Waddell G, Burton AK. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Occup Med (Lond). 2001;51(2):124-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/51.2.124 11. Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Jordan JL et al. Absence fromwork and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review andmeta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(6):448-56. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101571 12. Dahl E, van derWel KA, Harsløf I. Arbeid, helse og sosial ulikhet. Oslo; 2011. 13. Helsedirektoratet, Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet. Arbeid og helse - et tettere samvirke. 2016. 14. Helsedirektoratet, Arbeids-og velferdsdirektoratet. Strategi for fagfeltet Arbeid og Helse. 2021. 15. Loisel P. Intervention for return to work--what is really effective? Scand JWork Environ Health. 2005;31(4):245-7. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.879 16. Thornquist E. Vitenskapsfilosofi og vitenskapsteori for helsefag: Fagbokforlaget; 2018. 17. Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):795-805. https://doi. org/10.1177/1403494812465030 18. Rognved E. Behandlerens rolle og arbeidslivets spilleregler. Fysioterapeuten. 2018(5):22-5. 19. Eftedal M, Kvaal AM, Ree E et al. How do occupational rehabilitation clinicians approach participants on long-term sick leave in order to facilitate return to work? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):744. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12913-017-2709-y 20. Aanesen F, Øiestad BE, Grotle M et al. Implementing a StratifiedVocational Advice Intervention for People on Sick Leave with Musculoskeletal Disorders: AMultimethod Process Evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2021:1-13. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10926-021-10007-6 21. Grant M, O. Beirne-Elliman J, Froud R et al. The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a meta-ethnography. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e025743. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025743 22. Lovdata. Forskrift omnasjonal retnngslinje for fysioterapiutdanning. 2019. [Updated 25.04.2022. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2019-03-15-410 23. Malterud K. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder for medisin og helsefag. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget;2017. Title: How do physiotherapists include the work perspective in the treatment of patients on sick leave for musculoskeletal disorders? Abstract Purpose: Explore how physiotherapists in private practice, educated during the last 10 years in Norway, include the work perspective in treatment of patients on sick leave for musculoskeletal disorders, who they collaborate with and how they experience their role and competence in the field. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with nine physiotherapists in private practice were conducted. Systematic text condensation was used to analyze the data. Findings: Three main categories appeared i) The patient in the center, ii) Unclear role in the sick leave work and iii) Good basic competence, but the need for more knowledge about regulations and social security topics. Conclusion: The physiotherapists address questions about work in the treatment of patients on sick leave for musculoskeletal pain. The interdisciplinary collaboration is limited, and much of the communication with other actors goes via the patient. The physiotherapists still believe they are an important professional group concerning sickness absence, but they need clarification of their own role and responsibility in this work, as well as more knowledge about regulations and social security topics. Keywords: Musculoskeletal pain, sick leave, interdisciplinary collaboration, work participation. Dictus Hip For de med redusert styrke i benmuskulaturen! www.erimed.se order@erimed.se, +46 (0)8 449 56 50 Dictus Hip gir kraft til benet i svingfasen, og dermed en bedre gangfunksjon. Dictus Hip gir direkte respons vedrørende resultatet. For mer informasjon:

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTQ3Mzgy