Fysioterapeuten 8-2017

FYSIOTERAPEUTEN 8/17 27 lationskapandet, helhetsbedömningen samt behandlingsupplägget. Studier av yrkesutövning med fokus på det som sker och har betydelse i mötet väl- komnas för ytterligare utveckling och förstå- else för vår profession. Forskning kan bidra till att kvaliteten på fysioterapi i specifika kontexter blir bättre och att fysioterapeuters kunskapsområden lyfts fram. Referenser 1. Statistisk sentralbyrå . Befolkningsfremskrivninger, 2014-2100 Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå; 2014 [Tillgäng- lig från: http://www.ssb.no/folkfram/ ]. 2. Strand BH, Eriksen HM, Tambs K, Skirbekk V. Helse hos eldre i Norge. I: Folkehelserapporten 2014. Folkehelsein- stituttet, 2014. 3. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Seniorer i Norge 2010. Oslo- Kongsvinger: 2011. 4. Helbostad JL, Granbo R, Østerås H. Aldring og bevegelse: fysioterapi for eldre. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2007. 5. Martinsen IS, Tingvoll W-A, Kwesi Kassah A. Når samhandlingsreformen tvinger fram samarbeid...mens rehabiliteringen står på vent. I: Lind Kassah BL, Tingvoll W-A, Kwesi Kassah A, redaktörer. Samhandlingsreformen under lupen – Kvalitet, organisering og makt i helse- og omsorgstjenestene. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2014. s. 139-52. 6. Thornquist E. Kommunikasjon: teoretiske perspekti- ver på praksis i helsetjenesten. 2 utg. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2009. 7. Koch LV, Wottrich AW, Holmqvist LW. Rehabilitation in the home versus the hospital: the importance of contex t . Disability & Rehabilitation. 1998;20(10):367-72. 8. Heckman KA, Cott CA. Home-based physiotherapy for the elderly: a different world . Physiotherapy Canada. 2005;57:274-83. 9. Thornquist E. Three voices in a Norwegian living room: an encounter from physiotherapy practice . Medi- cal Anthropology Quarterly. 1997;11(3):324-51. 10. Watzlawick P, Bavelas JB, Jackson DD. Pragmatics of human communication : a study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton; 1967. 11. Goffman E. Vårt rollespill til daglig: en studie i hver- dagslivets dramatikk. Oslo: Pax Forlag A/S; 1992. 12. Kendon A. Conducting interacion: patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 13. Goffman E. The interaction order: american sociolo- gical association, 1982 presidential addres s . American sociological review. 1983;48(1):1-17. 14. Måseide P. Possibly abusive, often benign, and always necessary. On power and domination in medical practice . Sociology of Health & Illness. 1991;13(4):545- 61. 15. Grimen H. Profesjon og tillit. Profesjonsstudier. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2008. 16. Jensen K. Hjemlig omsorg i offentlig regi: en studie av kunnskapsutvikling i omsorgsarbeid. Oslo: Universitets- forlaget; 1992. 17. Gullestad M. Kultur og hverdagsliv: på sporet av det moderne Norge. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 1989. 18. Thornquist E. Vitenskapsfilosofi og vitenskapsteori: for helsefag. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2003. 19. Merleau-Ponty M. Kroppens fenomenologi. Göteborg: Daidalos; 1999. 20. Gallagher S. Body image and body schema: a con- ceptual clarification . The Journal of Mind and Behavior. 1986;7(4):541-54. 21. Thornquist E. Movement and interaction: the Sher- bourne approach and documentation. Oslo: Universitets- forlaget; 2012. 22. Magill RA, Anderson DI. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 10 utg. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2014. 23. McNevin N, Wulf G, Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self-control, and Dyad training on motor learning: Implications for physical rehabilitation . Physical Therapy. 2000;80(4):373-85. 24. Örnholmer L. Hembesök hos äldre patienter; fysiote- rapi – relation – kommunikation. [Mastergradsuppsats]. Bergen: Høgskolen i Bergen; 2016. 25. Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning: en innføring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2011. 26. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Det kvalitative forskningsinter- vju. 2 utg. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2009. 27. Thagaard T. Systematikk og innlevelse: en innføring i kvalitativ metode. 4 utg. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2013. 28. Mishler EG. Research Interviewing: Harvard University Press; 1991. Title: Communication – relationship – physiotherapy. An interview study about home visits with elderly people. Abstract n Purpose : To obtain an extended understanding of how communication and relationship between patient and physiotherapist mutually influence each other and the performance of physiotherapy during home visits to elderly people. n Design : Semi-structured interviews. n Material : Six experienced physiotherapists in different municipalities in Norway were interviewed. n Method : The authors read the transcribed material thoroughly several times before identifying the entities of meaning. These formed the basis for themes from which subthemes were determined. After further interpretation citations were chosen to enlighten the participants’ voices. n Findings : Two main themes each with a subtheme, are presented: «Function as the pivotal» and «Distribution of roles». The home as context is decisive for the physiotherapeutic assessment and planning of treatment. Social norms and rituals affect the meeting between patient and physiotherapist, in that the latter is a guest in the home of the former. Relationship and interaction are integrated parts of professional practice and trust acts as a tool to facilitate and improve the exercising of physiotherapy. n Conclusion : The study highlights the interplay between communication, relationship and physiotherapy during home visits with elderly people. By allowing the home as a context to be a significant part of the functional assessment and being aware of the social processes and roles, the physiotherapist can facilitate mea- ningful rehabilitation. n Keywords : physiotherapy, communication, professional-patient relationship, home visits, elderly people. Ønsker du å bidra med kunnskapsformidling i Fysioterapeuten? For ytterligere info, gå inn på http://fysioterapeuten.no/Fag-og-vitenskap/Forfatterveiledning Kunnskapsformidling i Fysioterapeuten Velkommen som forfatter!

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTQ3Mzgy