Fysioterapeuten 8-2020

FYSIOTERAPEUTEN 8/20 43 embodiment. Burlington, USA, Ashgate. 2014: 1-10. 5. LeBesco K. Revolting bodies. The struggle to rede- fine fat identity. Amherst and Boston, University of Massachusetts Press. 2004. 6. Rich, E., Monaghan, L.F. & Aphramor, L. (2011) Intro- duction: Contesting obesity discourse and presenting an alternative. I: Rich, E., Monaghan, L.F. & Aphramor, L.(eds): Debating Obseity. Critical perspectives. Palgrave Macmillian. s. 1-34. 7. Skrede J. Kritisk diskursanalyse. 1. utgave. Oslo; Cap- pelen Damm AS, 2017. 8. Johannessen LEF, Rafoss TW, Rasmussen EB. Hvor- dan bruke teori? Nyttige verktøy i kvalitativ analyse. Kap.3, s.49-93. 1.utgave. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2018. 9. TV2.no https://www.tv2.no/a/3575215 Hentet 010620. 10. Hofmann B. Etiske aspekter ved fedmebehandling av barn og unge. Tilleggsrapport. Oslo: Folkehelseinsti- tuttet, 2016. 11. Hanssen-Bauer MW. & Knutsen IR. Hvordan foreldre reagerer når barnet er overvektig. Sykepleien.no/ forskning 10.4220/Sykepleief. 2017.61920 12. Ikeda JP, Crawford PB, Woodward-Lopez G. BMI scree- ning in schools: helpful or harmful? Health Education Research 2006, 21 (6): 761-769. https://doi. org/10.1093/her/cyl144  13. Pont SJ, Puhl R, Cook SR, Slusser W. Stigma expe- rienced by children and adolescents with obesity. Pediatrics 2017. 140(6). https://doi.org/10.1542/ peds.2017-3034  14. Malterud K & Ulriksen K. Obesity, stigma and respon- sibility in health care: A synthesis of qualitative stu- dies. Int. J Qualitative Stud Health Well-being 2011, 6:8404 https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v6i4.8404 15. Mead E, Brown T, Rees K et al. Diet, physical activity and behavioral interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese children from the age of 6 to 11 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6: CD012651.  16. Skodvin VA, Lekahl S, Kommedal KG.et al. Livss- tilsbehandling av barn og ungdom med alvorlig fedme – resultater etter ett år. Tidsskr Nor Legefo- ren 2020. doi:10.4045/tidsskr.19.0682 17. De Vries J. The obesity epidemic: medical and ethical considerations. Sci Eng Ethics 2017, 13: 55 -67.  htt- ps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9002-0  18. Major B, Hunger JM, Bunyan DP, Miller CT 2014 The ironic effects of weight stigma. Journal of Experimen- tal Psychology 51: 74–80. 19. Grepperud S. Kvalitet i helsetjenesten – hva menes egentlig? Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2009; 129: 1112- 4.  https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.08.0377  20. Neumann CB. Det bekymrede blikket. En studie av helsesøstres handlingsbetingelser. 1. utgave. Oslo; Novus Forlag, 2009. 21. Pettersvold M, Østrem S. Problembarn og programin- vasjon. I: Pettersvold M, Østrem S, red. Problembarna. Manualer og metoder i barnehage, skole og barne- vern. 1. utgave. Oslo; Cappelen Damm Akademisk, 2019: 7-32. 22. Focault M. Klinikkens fødsel. Hans Reiezels Forlag. København DK. Gyldendal, 2019 23. Gard M, Wright J. The obesity epidemic: Science, mo- rality and ideology. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2005. 24. O’Hara L, Taylor J. What’s wrong with “the war on obesity”? A narrative review of the weight-centered paradigm and development of the 3C framework to build critical competency for a paradigm shift. SAGE Open, April-June 2018: 1–28. https://doi. org/10.1177/2158244018772888 25. Tylka TL, Annunziato RA, Burgard D, Danielsdottir S, Shuman E, Davis C, & Calogero RM. The weight-in- clusive versus weight-normative approach to health: Evaluating the evidence for prioritizing well-being, over weight- loss. Journal of Obesity 2014. https:// doi.org/10.1155/2014/983495  26. Goffman E. Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. UK. Penguin Books. 2019. 27. Evans J, Rich E, Davies B, Allwood R. Education, Disor- dered Eating and Obesity Discourse: Fat Fabrications. London: Routledge. 2008. 28. Setchell, J., Gard, M., Jones, L. & Watson, B.M. Addres- sing weight stigma in physiotherapy: development of a theory-driven approach to (re)thinking weight- related interaction. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. An international journal of Physical Therapy 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.201 7.1328718 Title: Active on his own terms? A discourse analysis of professional guidelines Abstract n Purpose : To investigate how language and meaning production express and explain overweight, within official guidelines for prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents. n Design : Discourse analysis. n Material : National guidelines for primary care. n Method : Question based reading. n Results : Through discursive measures within the language in use, the guidelines produce both an ordinary family with a hectic daily life, a vulnerable family and a deviant one with challenges. The guidelines use stigmatizing discourses, producing people with overweight as lacking control and knowledge. A discursive order that gives precedence to the medical perspective on overweight and obesity, risk to medicalize overweight children based on bodyweight alone. Health care personnel are provided a paternalistic position within lifestyle treatment, despite weak evidence for the treat- ment offered and despite explicit ethical considerations and user involvement. n Conclusion : The Norwegian Directorate of Health tend to use stigmatizing discour- ses to construct children with overweight and their families. The discourses risk to disguise the possibility of understanding these families as people with resources. For physiotherapists to contribute in valid ways within lifestyle treatment, they must reflect upon their own position within the stigmatizing discourses. n Keywords : children, overweight, stigma, guidelines, discourse analysis. En enklere måling? – Fysiopartner tilbyr nye alternativer www.fysiopartner.no | salg@fysiopartner.no | T: 23 05 11 60

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTQ3Mzgy